Mr. Huang won the first instance of MDI trademark infringement case on behalf of clients

　　　Recently, the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court made a judgment in the first instance on the case of infringement of trademark rights， by Fulong Advanced Technology Co., Ltd. and Jiangyin Gaoyi Machinery Industry Co., Ltd.: Gaoyi Company stopped producing and selling "MDI" air pressure rods, and issued a statement on the company's website to eliminate the adverse effects on Fulong Company, compensate Fulong Company for economic losses of 300000 yuan and reasonable expenses of more than 50000 yuan, and bear legal costs.

　　Huang Jibao, the chief lawyer of Beijing Zhihuan Law Firm, represents Fulong. Fulong Company was established in 1978 and is located in Tainan, Taiwan. The company focuses on the research, development and production of office furniture accessories, and sells them to China and around the world. No. 3735040 "MDI" registered trademark was approved to be registered by the company on November 14, 2005 and approved to be used on Class 7 air bar and other commodities. Fulong Company found that Gaoyi Company claimed that it was authorized by Fulong Company to supply air pressure rods with the logo of "MDI" in the domestic market. Fulong Company sued Wuxi Intermediate People's Court for infringement of its exclusive right to use its trademark by Gaoyi Company.

　　In this case, Lawyer Huang Jibao and his team actively provided evidence from the popularity and influence of the "MDI" trademark of Fulong Company and the fact that the infringing goods involved were produced and sold by Gaoyi Company, so as to achieve the agency goal. By notarizing the relevant website of the defendant, the awards, purchase and sales contracts, export declaration forms and other evidences of Fulong Company in the Taiwan industry, it is proved that "MDI" has a high reputation and is recognized by Gaoyi Company. As for Gao Yi's explanation that the accused product was paid off by the outsider in 2013, but not produced by him, the agent showed the accused product in court during the trial, pointing out that GaoYi had marked the production year and week under the "MDI" logo in order to counterfeit the logo of Fulong, thus eliminating the judge's concern and successfully identifying the product involved as being produced and sold by Gao Yi.